The Conversation
29 Mar 2020, 18:09 GMT+10
Countries around the world are taking unprecedented action to stem financial collapse due to COVID-19. Governments are acting as insurers of last resort, providing liquidity to both individuals and corporations in dire straits.
In these perilous times, the insurance sector itself will also be paying out claims, whether it's to people who have experienced damage to life or property or to businesses and even to sovereign countries.
Insurance companies are designed to bring order and stability to precarious financial situations and they have the wherewithal to do so.
Catastrophe bonds
Like other financial players that have embraced innovation in recent years, insurers too have developed novel tools and products. One such innovation is catastrophe bonds.
A catastrophe bond provides the issuer (usually either an insurer or a reinsurer) with financial protection in case of a major catastrophe. Most catastrophe bonds cover extreme natural events such as hurricanes or earthquakes, but some bonds cover pandemics like the one the world is facing now.
Read more: The stormy outlook for insurance-linked securities
In effect, when employing catastrophe bonds, insurers can access capital from large asset owners such as pension funds and other institutional investors. Insurers need this extra layer of protection for themselves, because catastrophes typically hit a region very abruptly.
This means that when a major disaster strikes, large amounts of money need to be disbursed suddenly, threatening the insurer with insolvency. Asset owners are willing to provide this coverage - for a premium, often hefty - because it can be an effective diversification strategy: earthquakes, hurricanes and pandemics are essentially unrelated to global economic trends.
Catastrophe bonds are very specific in terms of the coverage they provide. Like other insurance products, they are binding contracts that specify exactly what perils are covered and when the funds are released or "triggered."
Alternatively, a bond might be triggered to recoup some of the insurance payouts following the catastrophe, but only if they exceed a certain pre-defined dollar threshold. As in regular reinsurance, catastrophe bonds provide payouts in tranches, for example to cover the losses incurred by the issuer after the first $2 billion in losses, up until $2.3 billion in losses, following a specific extreme event.
To date, 1,069 distinct bonds within 648 offerings have been issued since the first one in 1997.
Read more: When catastrophe strikes, who foots the bill?
The first pandemic bond was issued in 2003, when Swiss Re floated a US$400 million offering to provide coverage against extreme mortality events such as war, terrorism, pandemics or nuclear attack.
The bond would trigger if the mortality index (which measures annual general mortality in five countries, the U.S., the United Kingdom, France, Switzerland and Italy) exceeded 130 per cent of its baseline due to any of these scenarios.
Since then, a total of 27 additional catastrophe bonds have been issued with a pandemic component. To date, none of them have been triggered.
Who benefits when catastrophe strikes?
The use of catastrophe bonds, perhaps unsurprisingly, is controversial. One critique emphasizes the huge uncertainty inherent in attempting to quantify what are, by definition, very rare, unpredictable events.
Others have noted that catastrophe modelling is problematic in that it harnesses tacit knowledge shared within closed, opaque communities. In our research, we discovered that catastrophe models don't function any better than guesswork, and seem to have become popular mainly because of the absence of high-return options in more traditional stocks and corporate bonds.
This controversy seems to be especially acute for pandemic bonds. For example, opining about the latest bond with a pandemic component - the Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility (PEF) sponsored by the World Bank - Lawrence Summers, the former U.S. treasury secretary, went so far as to call it is "goofy" and an "embarrassing mistake." After reading the 386-page prospectus, we agree.
That's because, from a public welfare perspective - as we are all learning now - the speediness of response is crucial. The PEF states clearly in the prospectus that its purpose is "to help prevent rare, high-severity disease outbreaks from becoming pandemics." This means that it should trigger and pay out before a disease like COVID-19 becomes a pandemic, not after.
In conclusion, some healthy skepticism is warranted when considering the social value of catastrophe bonds.
Conceptually, they can be a useful financial tool, but the devil is in the details: What exactly is written in the fine print? How accurately is the risk modelled? How big are the payouts to investors? How quickly are the funds disbursed?
A bond triggered by a World Health Organization declaration of a pandemic, with immediate payouts and large sums of money available, would be a bond with high social value. A bond that provides too little money too late - or none at all - is just financialization run amok.
Authors: Dror Etzion - Associate Professor, Strategy and Organizations, McGill University | Bernard Forgues - Professor of organization theory, EM Lyon | Emmanuel Kypraios - Assistant Professor in Management, School of Business, National University of Ireland Maynooth
Get a daily dose of Breaking Property News news through our daily email, its complimentary and keeps you fully up to date with world and business news as well.
Publish news of your business, community or sports group, personnel appointments, major event and more by submitting a news release to Breaking Property News.
More InformationOTTAWA, Canada: With Canada Post struggling to maintain operations amid labour unrest, rivals like FedEx and UPS are stepping in to...
NEW YORK, New York - U.S. and global markets showed a mixed performance in Tuesday's trading session, with some indices edging higher...
PARIS, France: French military and intelligence officials have accused China of orchestrating a covert campaign to damage the reputation...
NEW DELHI, India: Birkenstock is stepping up its efforts to protect its iconic sandals in India, as local legal representatives conducted...
HONG KONG: China has fired back at the European Union in an escalating trade dispute by imposing new restrictions on medical device...
NEW YORK, New York - Monday's trading session saw mixed performances across U.S. and global markets, with several major indices posting...
NAIROBI, July 4 (Xinhua) -- Chinese contractors are helping advance Kenya's construction sector by transferring technologies, the industry...
Trumps giant win does not validate his unconstitutional birthright citizenship order
Jon Coupal- Both parties continue to play soccer with the proverbial can
Californias politics drifts rightward while New Yorks leans left
California is fighting a losing battle against Title IX and human biology